If I Could Have
Written the Energy Bill... -- A Guest Commentary
August 09, 2005 — By Ken Bossong, SUN DAY Campaign
Rising energy imports, climate
change, and reliance on polluting fossil fuel and nuclear technologies
all threaten the nation's economy, national security, public health, and
the environment. None of these problems will go away. None will be
solved by the new energy bill. In fact, all may well be made worse by
it.
Therefore, now that President Bush has signed the Energy Policy Act of
2005, it is time for Congress to pass legislation that actually
addresses the nation's energy needs, which include:
a.) reducing greenhouse gas emissions to a level consistent with a
world-wide goal of global climate stabilization (e.g., curbing U.S. CO2
emissions by 60-80% from current levels by mid-century);
b.) eliminating U.S. imports of oil and natural gas (now 58% and 15%
respectively) as well as uranium;
c.) phasing out the current generation of nuclear power; and
d.) decreasing energy waste and making a transition to sustainable,
environmentally safer renewable energy sources.
More specifically, it is economically and technically feasible to
actually reduce total domestic energy use by 20% over the next two
decades while meeting a fifth of the nation's energy needs with
renewables. By 2050, total energy use could actually be cut by 40% or
more from today's levels with at least half of U.S. energy supply coming
from renewable sources. Such a scenario would also allow for greenhouse
gas emissions to be cut by over 60%.
Such an energy future would simultaneously create new domestic jobs and
businesses, improve national security and the economy, and enhance the
environment and public health.
However, it would require legislative enactment of a politically
ambitious agenda that would probably include most of the following
components, many of which Congress left on the cutting room floor as it
finalized the energy bill:
By 2025, fuel economy standards for cars and trucks should be at least
double what they are today, beginning with a 50% increase in fuel
economy for new vehicles by the year 2015.
By 2025, total annual person-miles traveled by automobile and truck
should be at levels no higher than today through expansion of mass
transit, better land use planning, and telecommuting.
By 2025, no less than 25 percent of the nation's liquid transportation
fuels should be provided, or displaced, by renewable sources, including
renewably-generated hydrogen.
By 2025, no less than 25 percent of the nation's electricity should be
generated by renewable energy sources and with a federal mandate to
increase that amount by at least one percent/year thereafter.
By 2025, state and/or federal standards should mandate that the energy
efficiency of appliances, motors, and lighting should be improved by no
less than 20 percent as measured on a total fuel cycle basis.
By 2025, state and/or federal standards should mandate that 20 percent
of all new buildings must be zero energy buildings (moving twoards a
goal of all new buildings being zero energy by 2050), using a
combination of efficient design and clean on-site energy production;
By 2025, energy use in the electricity sector should be reduced by at
least 10 percent through the use of clean distributed generation such as
combined heat & power, district energy, fuel cells, and improved energy
storage and transmission technologies.
In addition, energy efficiency resource standards for electric and gas
utilities should be established with a target savings of at least one
percent of annual sales each year, on an incremental basis, such that
savings build on previous years' impacts.
Expansion of renewable energy, energy efficiency and clean distributed
generation technologies should be promoted through national
interconnection standards (i.e., net metering and transmission access
reforms), production and investment tax incentives, government
procurement, updated resource assessment, and state and local planning
programs.
Annual federal funding for the research, development, and deployment of
energy efficient and renewable energy technologies should be at least
doubled over the next five years and expanded to no less than five times
current levels by 2025.
Funding to support sustainable energy budget outlays and tax incentives,
as well as to alleviate low-income consumer impacts, should be drawn
from a mix of gradually increased dedicated taxes on carbon-based fuels,
energy imports, and fossil fuel leases on federal lands.
Any new coal-based powerplants should be required to achieve energy
efficiency and environmental performance equal to, or better than, the
best-available Integrated Combined Cycle Coal Gasification technology,
and must include full and permanent carbon capture and sequestration.
Finally, licenses for existing nuclear power plants should not be
renewed or extended and federal nuclear funds should be directed towards
plant decommissioning and waste clean-up, storage & disposal
Such a legislative agenda would require a level of political leadership
and vision rarely displayed by Congress. However, playing ostrich and
trying to duck the tough energy problems facing the United States will
not make them go away. Now that President Bush has signed Energy Policy
Act of 2005 it is time for Congress to return to the drawing board and
get serious about producing legislation that actually addresses the
nation's energy needs.
|