California governor sets off energy debate
San Jose Mercury News, Calif. --Aug. 18
Aug. 18--As the tug-of-war over the future of California's electricity system heats up, critics of Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's market-oriented approach said Tuesday that it will be a bust for consumers and a boon for Calpine.
"Calpine has most of the new possible generation coming on, so if you
say no to utilities building plants and you've got to sign a lot of contracts
now, Calpine has us over a barrel," said Lenny Goldberg, a lobbyist for The
Utility Reform Network consumer group.
Calpine spokesman Kent Robertson called the assertion silly.
"Isn't the whole point of this exercise to sign contracts to get unbuilt
power plants built?" Robertson said. "Either the state needs to
license more power plants, or sole-source the next round to the utilities. We
all know what happens when that happens. Prices creep up."
The Republican governor's administration last week formally opposed Assembly
Speaker Fabian Nunez's energy bill, AB 2006, calling the legislation unnecessary
and saying it would re-regulate the state's energy system and force cost
overruns by monopoly utilities onto consumers.
Nunez, D-Los Angeles, whose bill is backed by the Southern California Edison
utility as well as consumer groups like TURN, fired back in a letter Tuesday to
Schwarzenegger saying the governor's policies would "return to the failed
policies of electricity deregulation."
"Your energy policy," Nunez wrote, "not only fails to
accomplish what you intend, but very well could result in higher-cost energy for
California consumers."
Schwarzenegger spokeswoman Ashley Snee said that under the governor's plan
"all market participants would have the opportunity to compete to provide
power to the utilities, thereby assuring California ratepayers have the lowest
costs possible."
Lawmakers, Schwarzenegger, large businesses and consumer groups agree
California needs to formalize an energy policy that lays out the roles for
utilities and private power generators so they can start building new power
plants. Demand on the high-voltage grid already has hit record peak-usage levels
this summer, and state officials fear another energy crisis as soon as 2006 if
new plants aren't built.
But they disagree over how regulated utilities and unregulated private power
generators will provide electricity, and the role of the Legislature and the
California Public Utilities Commission in setting energy policy.
Schwarzenegger and administration backers, including independent power
producers and big businesses, believe legislation is only needed so large
customers can shop around again for the best electricity price instead of
relying on utilities. Otherwise, they say, the PUC has the authority it needs.
Nunez said he doesn't want to "abdicate virtually all responsibility on
energy policy" to utilities commissioners who are appointed by the
governor, especially when the two considered most sympathetic to consumer groups
finish their terms this year.
Nunez initially had included in his bill a provision for big businesses to
shop for power, but dropped it because both business and consumer groups
complained.
Concern about Calpine's role arises in the context of the governor's desire
for utilities such as Pacific Gas & Electric to have by 2006 a 15 percent
reserve supply of power providing a safety cushion over projected demand.
Calpine holds permits to build four power plants totaling 3,500 megawatts,
more than half the total approved by the state but not yet built, according to
the California Energy Commission. Nine other approved but unbuilt plants by
other companies total 3,300 new megawatts. A megawatt powers about 750 homes.
Forcing utilities to build up reserves so fast would create a seller's market
for independent power companies that already hold permits to build new plants,
allowing them to name the price in their contract, critics say.
Robertson said the concern is unfounded, as state regulators would need to
approve any electricity contract with a company like Calpine.
Calpine gave $25,000 to Schwarzenegger's California recovery team fund this
year, but last year gave $20,000 to former Gov. Gray Davis' fight against the
recall that made Schwarzenegger governor.
-----
To see more of the San Jose Mercury News, or to subscribe to the newspaper,
go to http://www.mercurynews.com .
(c) 2004, San Jose Mercury News, Calif. Distributed by
Knight Ridder/Tribune Business News. For information on republishing this
content, contact us at (800) 661-2511 (U.S.), (213) 237-4914 (worldwide), fax
(213) 237-6515, or e-mail reprints@krtinfo.com. CPN, PCG,