Renewable energy can meet all human needs, suggests report

LONDON, England, 2004-06-23 (Refocus Weekly)

Even a small shift of support away from fossil fuels to renewables could save millions of lives and help avert global warming, according to the British think-tank New Economics Foundation.

“The combined spiralling costs of climate change and dwindling supplies of oil mean that, without a major shift to renewable energy, internationally-agreed targets to reduce poverty will not be met and people in all countries will suffer a progress-reversing energy shock,” says ‘The Price of Power.’ Development strategies that meet growing demand for energy from fossil fuels are “self-defeating and doomed to failure,” with the cost of natural disasters linked to global warming reaching $60 billion a year.

“Around the world, control of fossil fuels is linked to corruption and violence,” says Andrew Simms of nef. “Burning them causes climate change which, in turn, puts an impossible obstacle in the way of ending poverty.”

“Reshaping our energy supply holds the secret to ending poverty and preventing global warming,” he adds. “Small-scale renewables remain the best answer for communities and the environment. The growing threat to the conventional energy supply means any long-term efforts to improve the human condition will have to be linked to renewable energy sources.”

Lack of access to reliable clean energy is a major barrier to improving well-being of 1.6 billion people around the world who lack access to electricity, and a fast-approaching global energy and climate crisis threatens to reverse human development, it explains. Renewables currently contribute 13% of global energy, but have the technical potential to increase by 120 times.

All of non-electrified sub-Saharan Africa could be provided with solar energy for less than 70% of what OECD countries spend on subsidizing fossil fuel sources each year, it adds, while one year’s worth of World Bank spending on fossil fuel projects could provide ten million people in Africa with electricity if the money were re-directed to small-scale solar installations.

Subsidies to coal, oil and natural gas are “conservatively” $235 billion per year and “directly distort the global economy and hold back the development of renewables,” it adds. “The energy industry is further skewed by the fact that the direct costs of damage by carbon emission - estimated by the British government at between £50 and £200 per tonne - are not factored into the price of fossil fuels.”

The capital requirements of renewables can be lower than conventional and centralized investments, and the report calls for official adoption of key targets for the uptake of renewable energy. Among the recommendations are to implement the G8’s target of serving at least one billion people around the world with renewables by 2010, phase out government subsidies for fossil fuels and nuclear energy, reform international financial institutions and export credit agencies to “dramatically increase” funding for renewables in developing countries, phase out World Bank subsidies to fossil fuel projects by 2008, and increase the target for clean energy to two billion people over the next ten years.


Click here for more info...

Visit http://www.sparksdata.co.uk/refocus/ for your international energy focus!!

Refocus © Copyright 2004, Elsevier Ltd, All rights reserved.