California utilities told to speed increase in reserves

The San Diego Union-Tribune --Oct. 29

Oct. 29--State regulators voted yesterday to order utilities to accelerate their buildup of electric generating reserves, saying it was needed to ensure power reliability in the state.

By a 3-2 vote, the California Public Utilities Commission said utilities must have a 15 percent to 17 percent reserve generating margin by June 2006, rather than by a January 2008 deadline set earlier. The new requirement means utilities must have the ability to provide 115 percent to 117 percent of their customers' expected peak demand by the target date. In a separate matter of concern to San Diego Gas & Electric customers, the PUC postponed to Nov. 19 a vote on reallocating up to $1 billion of costs from the power crisis.

California's other major utilities say SDG&E has avoided its fair share of the cost burden from expensive contracts signed during the power crisis and have pressed the PUC to assign more to San Diego power customers. Regional business, political and labor leaders are pressing for the smallest increase for San Diego electricity customers.

The PUC's new generating reserve margins, meanwhile, would be more than double what California had at times last summer, when demand was highest and electric generating reserves fell to as low as 6.5 percent. But no blackouts resulted.

A spokesman for the Western Electric Coordinating Council, the industry's primary reliability organization, said it generally recommends operating reserves of about 7 percent.

Recent forecasts have called for tightened power supplies next summer and commission President Michael Peevey said there was a need for action. "We can't wait any longer," he said.

Peevey deflected criticism that the accelerated demand would be a boon to power plant builders, saying the potential for developers to inflate new plant costs would "be much worse the longer we wait." But opponents of the tightened deadline questioned whether there was any technical reason for it. Noting that the 2006 deadline had been suggested by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, Commissioner Carl Wood called the need for an accelerated deadline a matter of "folklore."

"The governor has announced it's needed, so it must be so," Wood said sarcastically, before joining Commissioner Loretta Lynch in voting against the new deadline.

Lynch had authored a proposed order that would have kept the 2008 requirement in place. Arguing against the accelerated deadline, she said it would almost certainly result in increased power costs. Ed Van Herik, a spokesman for SDG&E, said the utility anticipated no problem in meeting the new requirement. Van Herik said the utility expected to have a new natural gas-fired power plant in Escondido completed by that time and also was pursuing the acquisition of additional renewable electric generating resources.

A local consumer advocate, however, said the new requirement would be costly.

"The level of 15 to 17 percent is an overly expensive insurance policy whose cost will be largely subsidized by small business and residential customers," said Michael Shames, executive director of San Diego's Utility Consumers' Action Network.

Shames said reserves as low as 11 percent were considered prudent before California's deregulation experiment and added that greater reserves would benefit only the largest electricity users -- who might get cheaper power deals from the additional capacity -- and plant developers. But Jan Smutny-Jones, executive director of the Independent Energy Producers Association, which represents plant developers, said a recent California Energy Commission report underscored the need for additional plant capacity, particularly in Southern California.

"We think this is a responsible approach, and we think it can be done in a manner that will provide reliable power at affordable rates," said Smutny-Jones, who added that 15 percent generating reserves were not historically high targets.

 

-----

To see more of The San Diego Union-Tribune, or to subscribe to the newspaper, go to http://www.uniontrib.com .

(c) 2004, The San Diego Union-Tribune. Distributed by Knight Ridder/Tribune Business News. For information on republishing this content, contact us at (800) 661-2511 (U.S.), (213) 237-4914 (worldwide), fax (213) 237-6515, or e-mail reprints@krtinfo.com. SRE,