likely, not less. Keep praying. It may be a long, tough year ahead.

• Los Angeles Times: Mysterious blasts, slayings suggest covert efforts in Iran — Attacks targeting nuclear scientists and sites lead some observers to believe that the U.S. and Israel are trying to derail Iran’s programs (covers multiple events over the past month)
• BBC: Is Iran already under covert attack?
• Iran state television displays ‘downed U.S. surveillance drone’
• Drone Crash in Iran Reveals Secret U.S. Surveillance Effort
• A second Iranian nuclear facility has exploded, as diplomatic tensions rise between the West and Tehran (focuses on Nov 30 blast in Isfahan)
  
• ‘Blast in Iran struck uranium enrichment facility’ (covers Nov 30 blast in Isfahan)
  
• Explosion Seen as Big Setback to Iran’s Missile Program (further update on Nov 12 blast)
• New York Times reports “Images Show Devastation at Iran Base After Blast” (update on Nov 12)
• Iranian missile architect dies in blast. But was explosion a Mossad mission? Tehran says blast that killed 17 and rattled windows 30 miles away was an accident (covers Nov 12 blast at a missile testing base near Tehran)
  
• FLASHBACK: Top U.S. and Israeli experts discuss Iran nuclear program, the Stuxnet virus, and the Twelfth Imam (Dec 16, 2011)
  
• FLASHBACK: Covert war in Iran focus of Newsweek cover story (Dec 27, 2010)
• FLASHBACK: Stuxnet computer virus used against Iran’s nuclear computers was developed in Iran, reports NYT (January 16, 2011)

• Romney, Gingrich and Santorum gave serious, substantive addresses and answers during the Q&A sessions.
• The first two were important to watch because, obviously, they are leading in the polls — and many believe are the most plausible contenders for the Republican nomination. To their credit, both also delivered strong performances — Gingrich’s was better, but Romney wasn’t bad; either will be much better on Israel than President Obama, something more and more American Jews are beginning to realize.
• Gingrich said he’d appoint John Bolton to be Secretary of State, and move the U.S. Embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem — love that; other elements of the speech were excellent, too — definitely worth watching.
  
• Romney promised to make his first state visit to Israel, noting that Obama has visited a slew of Mideast countries and offered to meet with Ahmadinejad, but hasn’t found time to visit our most important and trustworthy ally in the region, Israel — amen; he said other good things, too, but the question remains whether he can be trusted on these issues when the Mideast heats up since he hasn’t exactly demonstrated himself as a man of lasting convictions.
• Santorum’s speech stood out to me — it’s worth watching, along with the other two. The man clearly has deep convictions on Israel and Iran. He knows these issues. He’s thought long and hard about them. He spoke to the RJC first, and spoke of a “gathering storm” building in the Middle East, borrowing Winston Churchill’s line regarding the rise of the Nazi threat in the 1930s. Santorum also impressed me as he explained how he led on major legislation to impose economic sanctions on Iran in 2006, before it was “popular.” He was opposed in the Senate by Joe Biden, and even opposed by President Bush. Yet as he explained, he eventually got his legislation passed unanimously as the situation in Iran worsened and Washington began to wake up to the dangers. Santorum was ahead of his time on the Iran issue, and the only one of the three to have put a specific plan on the table to neutralize Iran’s nuclear threat. Some say Santorum doesn’t have a shot. He’s only at 7% among likely voters in Iowa in the new ABC/Washington Post poll (though that’s up from 2% earlier this year). Still, there are 25 days to go before the Iowa caucuses — that’s a lifetime in politics, and it’s certainly been a wild ride so far. Who knows what will happen next? Regardless, Santorum’s is a welcome and important voice in the GOP debate and his foreign policy experience is vital to the party.
  
• Bachmann’s speech was okay, and she clearly loves Israel, but she lacked the gravitas of the others — and she made a very odd point of saying that a donor has told her he’s ready to pay for the move of the U.S. Embassy and Ambassador’s residence to Israel if she’s elected; that seemed a strange thing to say when she makes such a point of criticizing cronyism in politics.
• Perry said he’d increase aid to Israel — but didn’t he just say he was going to reduce all foreign aid?
• Huntsman was irrelevant, bless his heart.
• The RJC deserves credit for not inviting Ron Paul who is an isolationist, has a deep disrespect for Israel’s security needs and strategic importance to U.S. national security, and he is, frankly, out to lunch on the Iran issue.
  

——————————-

• Politico: At Republican Jewish Coalition, GOP candidates take hard line on Mideast
• Washington Post: Santorum warms them up [at Republican Jewish Coalition event], Huntsman leaves them cold
  
• National Journal: Santorum: Let’s Cut Off Iran’s Oil Supply
• Washington Post: Romney says Obama has ‘chastened’ Israel; he would visit nation in first trip as president
  
• Washington Post: Romney takes the high road [at the RJC event] and wins standing ovation
• New York Times: Gingrich sees growing radical Islamist threat
• Washington Times: Gingrich: John Bolton will be my secretary of state

————————-

Watch the best three speeches for yourself from the C-SPAN archives, in the order they were delivered:

• Santorum speech to RJC
• Romney speech to RJC
• Gingrich speech to RJC