When state commissioners sat down with two FERC
commissioners and FERC staff at the 123rd Annual
Meeting of the National Association of Regulatory
Utility Commissioners (NARUC), it was made clear the
commissioners are still grappling with the dictates
of FERC Order 1000.
FERC commissioner John Norris acknowledged that
transmission planning and cost allocation are
challenging areas. “You have the convergence of
public policy and economics and due process, and
then you throw in a little physics and it makes it
all complicated.”
Order No. 1000 requires public utility transmission
providers to improve transmission planning processes
and allocate costs for new transmission facilities
to beneficiaries of those facilities. It also
requires public utility transmission providers to
align transmission planning and cost allocation.
These changes will remove barriers to development of
transmission facilities, says FERC.
The reliability needs are relatively easy to
understand and to reach a determination of what must
be built to continue operating the system. “I
envision Order 1000 as giving license for us to
think bigger and broader than that,” Norris
said. “Building transmission is for the long term.
To think about what we want to achieve with public
policy and what’s the most economical way to achieve
those public policy objectives is how I see this
converging."
But others said at the meeting in St. Louis this
month that the details were still anything but
clear.
Paul Centolella, commissioner of the Public
Utilities Commission of Ohio, wondered aloud about
FERC’s reasons for changing the fundamental way
transmission planning is carried out. Under Order
1000, that planning “incorporate[is] greater
consideration of economics, greater consideration of
uncertainty,” and that has a material impact on his
role as a regulator.
“Before I could even tell you that yes, this line is
needed for public policy, I would need to understand
the economics, I would need to understand how this
addition would fare” over the long term, Centolella
said.
Other regulators expressed concerns about the
deadlines imposed by Order 1000.
Dana Murphy, chair of the Oklahoma Corporation
Commission, questioned the wisdom of FERC telling
the states and regions, “'We’re looking at long-term
planning but we’ll give you a year to do it.'"
Empowering Folks
Norris countered that the time frame is reasonable
for the two-step process: “Deciding what public
policy you’re going to put on the table and what’s
the process for considering it. The tough part will
be implementing that process.”
Garry Brown, chairman of the New York State Public
Service Commission raised the issue of defining
public policy. “We know we don’t have much of a
federal energy policy so the states have been busy
filling in the blanks. But we all fill it in a
little differently.” With that type of system, he
said, the same public policy objective can yield two
totally different results.
Illinois Commerce Commissioner Sherman Elliott
expressed his apprehension that decisions made in
one area of a sub-region could affect other areas of
that subregion. “My concern is how to isolate the
effects of other states’ non-market intrusions in to
my state’s market.”
Public policy decisions have a cost and “eventually,
the price makes it through to the consumer,” Elliott
said. “The consumer takes that economic implication
into the voting booth, and we get a four-year cycle
of whipsawing public policy.”
“Given the nebulous quality of cost allocation, I’m
unsure about how I’m going to be able to protect
ratepayers in my state from actions taken in other
states,” Elliott said.
Norris said the questions were all good questions,
but that the answers should come from those who
posed the questions. “We’ve really empowered folks
to come up with your own answers. You’ve certainly
identified some common questions; I’m hopeful this
will spur some discussion about common approaches”
to Order 1000 compliance.
Copyright © 1996-2011 by
CyberTech,
Inc.
All rights reserved.
To subscribe or visit go to:
http://www.energycentral.com
To subscribe or visit go to:
http://www.energybiz.com