University of Minnesota research suggests that wastewater
treated with standard technologies contains far greater quantities
A new University of Minnesota study reveals that the release of
treated municipal wastewater – even wastewater treated by the
highest-quality treatment technology – can have a significant effect
on the quantities of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, often referred
to as "superbacteria," in surface waters.
The study also suggests that wastewater treated using standard
technologies probably contains far greater quantities of
antibiotic-resistant genes, but this likely goes unnoticed because
background levels of bacteria are normally much higher than in the
water studied in this research.
The new study is led by civil engineering associate professor
Timothy LaPara in the University of Minnesota, Twin Cities College
of Science and Engineering. The study is published in the most
recent issue of "Environmental Science and Technology," a journal of
the American Chemical Society. The research was part of a unique
class project in a graduate-level civil engineering class at the
University of Minnesota focused on environmental microbiology.
Antibiotics are used to treat numerous bacterial infections, but
the ever-increasing presence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria has
raised substantial concern about the future effectiveness of
antibiotics. In response, there has been increasing focus on
environmental reservoirs of antibiotic resistance over the past
several years. Antibiotic use in agriculture has been heavily
scrutinized, while the role of treated municipal wastewater has
received little attention as a reservoir of resistance.
Antibiotic-resistant bacteria develop in the gastrointestinal
tracts of people taking antibiotics. These bacteria are then shed
during defecation, which is collected by the existing sewer
infrastructure and passed through a municipal wastewater treatment
facility.
In this study, the Ph.D. students and professor examined the
impact of municipal wastewater in Duluth, Minn., on pristine surface
waters by gathering water samples from the St. Louis River,
Duluth-Superior Harbor, and Lake Superior in northeastern Minnesota.
The treatment facility in Duluth is considered one of the best.
After solids and biological matter are removed, the Duluth
wastewater treatment is one of only a few in the country that filter
water a third time through a mixed media filter to remove additional
particles of bacteria and nutrients. Standard wastewater treatment
treats water twice to remove solids and biological matter.
"This was a unique and ideal location for this study because of
the exemplary wastewater treatment mixed with surprisingly pristine
surface waters with very low background levels of bacteria that
wouldn't mask our results," LaPara said. "Previous studies in which
treated municipal wastewater was implicated as a source of
antibiotic resistance were more convoluted because multiple sources
of antibiotic resistance genes existed, such as agricultural
activity and industrial wastewater discharges."
While the levels of overall bacteria were still relatively low in
the surface water samples, researchers in the University of
Minnesota study found that the quantities of antibiotic-resistant
genes and human-specific bacteria were typically 20-fold higher at
the site where treated wastewater was released into the
Duluth-Superior Harbor compared to nearby surface water samples.
"Current wastewater treatment removes a very large fraction of
the antibiotic resistance genes," LaPara said. "But this study shows
that wastewater treatment operations need to be carefully considered
and more fully studied as an important factor in the global ecology
of antibiotic resistance."
In addition to LaPara, researchers involved in the study include
civil engineering Ph.D. students Tucker Burch, Patrick McNamara,
David Tan; and bioproducts and biosystems engineering Ph.D. student
Mi Yan, with help from soil, water and climate Ph.D. student Jessica
Eichmiller.
The University of Minnesota research study was funded by the
National Science Foundation's broader impacts effort, which combines
research and education. The Minnesota Environment and Natural
Resources Trust Fund paid for time on the R/V Blue Heron ship to
collect water samples.
SOURCE: University of Minnesota