Evidence: Denver and DC Quakes Caused by Nukes
The sudden spike shown in both the very unusual DC and Denver
earthquakes on August 23 are consistent with an explosion from a
sub-surface nuclear bomb. A recent interview of Benjamin Fulford by
David Wilcock gives some intriguing possibilities about a counter coup,
and hope for release of suppressed energy technologies.
by
Sterling D. Allan
Pure Energy Systems News
Today I've received a phone call and a number of emails from people
referring to an
interview that David Wilcock conducted recently with Benjamin
Fulford, who asserts that the recent DC and Denver Quakes were spurred
by underground nukes wiping out two of the New World Order bunkers by
"white hat" elements in the U.S. Pentagon, signaling the end of days for
the dark cabal that have been running the planet for millennia. The
interview concludes with a discussion about how with this victory over
the dark elements of the former powers-that-be, that many hitherto
suppressed energy technologies will soon be released.
It's all a bit difficult to believe, and I probably wouldn't be
mentioning it to you were it not for some hard facts that support the
key points about the earthquakes not being natural. They have the same
seismological signature as what accompanies a nuclear blast detonated a
few miles below the Earth's surface.
Here is a government
website that gives a comparison of a nuclear test and an earthquake
on seismograph. Here is a comparison they show between the May 11, 1998
Indian Nuclear Test, and the April 4, 1995 earthquake in Pakistan.
It explains:
Livermore seismologist Bill Walter explains that the differences
in seismic P- and S-wave energy provide one method of discriminating
explosions from earthquakes. Seismic P waves are compressional
waves, similar to sound waves in the air. Shear (S) waves are
transverse waves, like those that propagate along a rope when one
end is shaken. Because underground explosions are spherically
symmetric disturbances, they radiate seismic P waves efficiently. In
contrast, earthquakes result from sliding or rupture along a buried
fault surface and strongly excite the transverse motions of S waves.
Thus, we expect that explosions will show strong P waves and weak S
waves and that earthquakes will show weak P waves and strong S
waves, as seen in Figure 2.
With that in mind, now look at this image of the seismic signature of
the DC quake as shown at
NBC17:
Readings from a seismograph
at Washington and Lee University, about 85 miles
southwest of the earthquake's epicenter in Mineral. |
Does that seismograph depict a natural quake or a nuke or
explosion-induced quake?
Could it be any more blatant?
Its as obvious as Building 7 being brought down by pre-placed demolition
charges on
9/11.
Here's the seismograph from the August 23 Denver quake that same day, as
published by the
Denver Post.
A seismogram of the Trinidad earthquake as recorded on the Kent Denver
School seismograph.
Again, the immediate onset of the large quake at the bottom right is
indicative of an explosion-induced quake, not a natural quake.
In poking around a little bit, I found an August 24 story from the
Canadian PressCore, titled:
Seismic evidence reveals
underground nuclear detonation south of Washington DC. The
author says that he was put onto this possibility by an unusual email he
received from someone who apparently was a whistleblower.
I was pointed to this overlooked piece of evidence by someone who
claimed to be with the United States Air Force. The story submission
appeared to be sent by mistake as nothing was visible in the body of
the submission. Instead of sending it to the trash I thought I would
apply an old intelligence trick I was taught back in 1989. I right
clicked my mouse on the body of the submission and selected all,
then copy. I then opened up the notepad and selected paste from the
menu. You would expect nothing to be pasted as there was nothing in
the body of the submission but, just as I thought, a paragraph was
pasted into the notepad. What was revealed was 1 paragraph whereby
who ever sent it stated he was a member of the United States Air
Force. He stated that the Virginia 5.8 magnitude earth "wasn't a
natural earthquake and not a HAARP earthquake". He told me to find a
seismograph of the Washington DC area earthquake and compare it to a
past earthquake. Then he stated that I should Google
DUMB or Deep Underground Military Bases. He ended by stating
"the ABC warnings are real". I tried to trace the IP of the
submission but they don't exists.
Air Force tunnel boring machine links deep
underground military bases across U.S.
In the introduction to his interview with Fulford about the Denver
and D.C. earthquakes not only being nuke-induced, but that they were
used to destroy two underground New World Order bunker cities (of
possibly 30,000 people each), Wilcock says:
I started to contact my own sources, which have been built up
over being a public figure on the Internet since 1999 – and gaining
the trust of many people in various classified programs. I was
absolutely astonished when I started to ask around and found out
that everyone I know, with one exception who probably wasn't on a
need-to-know basis, confirmed that this attack did happen.
I'm familiar with the underground bunkers and cities that the black
ops have been building. The best documentary I know on this was
done by Jesse Ventura in his "Conspiracy Theory" series. I built a
feature page on the 2012 episode in which the last half of the
program was devoted to the underground bunkers that have quietly been
built by dark elements in the U.S. Government looking out for their own
survival with no thought for informing or preparing the population at
large.
Here is some material that my awakened friend,
Fred Burks
compiled, who was formerly a translator for two U.S. Presidents:
Comparisons of seismograph readings for earthquakes with
nuclear tests
https://www.llnl.gov/str/Walter.html - Comparison of a
nuclear test and an earthquake on seismograph on a government
website
http://www.iris.edu/hq/programs/education_and_outreach/animations/17
- Comparison of seismograph signatures for various events
Washington, DC, 5.8 earthquake on Aug 23, 2011, 1:51 PM local
time
http://www2.nbc17.com/news/2011/aug/23/13/59-earthquake-rocks-virginia-ar-1324668
- Most striking seismograph of DC quake on NBC affiliate
http://www.news.cornell.edu/stories/Aug11/SneeEarthquake.html
- Cornell University seismograph quite definitive
http://www.geol.vt.edu/outreach/vtso/2011/0823-louisa -
Multiple seismographs of DC quake
http://www.iris.edu/cgi-bin/wilberII/wilberII_EnO_page4.pl?evname=20110823_175103.5.spyder
- Access to hundreds more
Denver, 5.3 earthquake on Aug 22, 2011, 11:43 PM local time
(roughly 12 hours before the DC quake)
http://www.denverpost.com/news/ci_18737351 - Denver Post
seismograph showing clearly nuclear explosion signature
http://www.iris.edu/cgi-bin/wilberII/wilberII_EnO_page4.pl?evname=20110822_233020.4.spyder
- Hundreds of seismograph readings
To see what seismographs look like for more normal earthquakes,
click below:
http://www.iris.edu/cgi-bin/wilberII/wilberII_EnO_page4.pl?evname=20110818_153740.0.spyder
- 4.6 scale Aug 18, 2011 Off the coast of British Columbia
http://www.iris.edu/cgi-bin/wilberII/wilberII_EnO_page4.pl?evname=20110902_110325.7.spyder
- 4.7 scale Sep 2, 2011 Utah
Both the Denver and DC earthquakes were quite shallow, with
official reports giving 3.7 miles depth for the DC quake (http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqsww/Quakes/se082311a.php)
and 2.5 miles for Denver (http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eqinthenews/2011/usc0005idz).
That is well within even conventional drilling technologies
these days (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kola_Superdeep_Borehole).
According to Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earthquake),
earthquakes under 70 km (43 miles) are considered "shallow
focus" earthquakes.
The Virginia quake was the
largest there in 117 years, while the Denver quake was the
largest in Colorado in 41 years. These two rare quakes
happened only 12 hours apart. (Washington Post; Denver Post;
Aug. 23, 2011)
So I find the evidence fairly solid that both of these quakes
were not natural.
|
I agree with Fred that there is definitely enough evidence to
consider the two very unusual quakes on August 23 as probably being
spurred by nukes. The question that is intriguing is why, who, and
how. Though it's hard to believe all the stuff covered in the
Wilcock-Fulford interview, I do think it's worth a perusal, to give you
something to think about and a working hypothesis to start from.
It's definitely worth our attention, especially if the release of
hitherto suppressed free energy patents is one of the upshots of this
recent counter coup.
What is alleged by Fulford and Wilcock is that the nukes were done by
good elements in the Pentagon who are fed up with the New World Order
conspirators using the US Military to enforce the spread of the police
state tyranny, whose plan is to reduce the world population by 90% down
to a "manageable" 500,000,000.
I personally am greatly encouraged by the possibility that there is that
high a level of resistance from within the ranks of what used to be
nearly totally controlled by the conspirators. It's a rebellion from
within what used to be something they controlled.
The two underground cities were probably two key bunkers where the New
World Order conspirators thought they could go run and hide while they
bring destruction to the inhabitants on the surface. But now they have
been sent a message: "We're all in this together here on planet Earth;
what you do to others you do to yourself, so stop the destruction."
Hanks Mills comments....
On September 17, 2011 11:43 PM, my associate
Hank Mills
added:
Elected government officials are not the only individuals who control
the course of human events. There exists powerful individuals from the
realms of banking, finance, secretive extra-government agencies, and the
military-industrial complex, who manipulate the strings that make the
puppets in official elected offices do their bidding. This tangled web
of the ultra elite power barons is not easy to sort through. I do not
think anyone fully understands the true structure of these
organizations, and their true motivations. What we do know, is that
these institutes and families of power have suppressed exotic
technologies and the truth about extraterrestrial activity on our
planet. This suppression has been on going since before the crash of an
extraterrestrial space craft near Roswell, NM in the year 1947.
If a nuclear attack did take place on one or more underground bases,
this would be a clear indication of dissension in the ranks of the
"powers that be." This whole situation reminds me -- to a certain extent
--of the situation in the fictional series Stargate SG1. In that
fictional series, a highly secret, ultra black-budget military
organization exists called, "Stargate Command." The leadership of this
organization have the task of trying to protect our planet from
extraterrestrial threats, exploring the galaxy by traveling through
"stargates" which allow near instantaneous travel to other worlds, and
maintaining the secrecy of their program. Those working for Stargate
Command are portrayed as being the "good guys", despite the fact they
suppress exotic technologies, withhold fundamental information about the
universe from the public, and often take it upon themselves to make
decisions that impact the entire human race -- mostly with little
supervision from elected authorities.
In this same fictional series, there are rouge groups, agencies, and
organizations that compete with the Stargate program. Some of these
entities claim to be opposed to Stargate Command's secrecy and track
record of sometimes putting humanity at risk, but in reality have their
selfish motivations. Of course there are groups of extraterrestrials in
this fictional series that have their own desires and interests. Some of
these groups of extraterrestrials are benevolent, others are
opportunistic, and still others are hostile. Although communicating with
these species have often benefited Stargate Command's efforts to protect
humanity, interaction with them have often created troublesome
situations or threats to Earth.
The simple fact is that in the fictional series of Stargate and in our
reality, it is not always easy to distinguish the good guys from the bad
guys. Even the attack on the underground bases may (or may not) have
prevented some sinister plot, this does not mean those who launched the
attack were "good." They may not be heroes, or on the side of the
billions of people on this planet. Their motivation for the attack may
not be as simple and pure as we may hope.
If these apparent earthquakes were actually attacks on underground
bunkers, thousands of people may have died. Many of these people
probably were not evil, sinister individuals plotting for the
eradication of 90% of the population, but could have simply been
engineers and scientists working jobs, to earn a paycheck. The majority
of those employed by these bases may have had no political agenda at
all, and simply were thrilled to work on exotic technologies -- or
needed to find a way to pay their mortgage!
For example, NASA has naysayed alternative energy and alternative
propulsion technologies for decades. The space agency has also belittled
and mocked the incontrovertible evidence that unknown craft are visiting
our planet. Regardless what we think of those who have actively
participated in suppression, we cannot forget that the majority of
people at NASA have had nothing to do with it. To think that everyone at
NASA is in a plot to suppress information that could change our world is
simply implausible beyond measure. Most of those individuals working at
NASA truly believe they are working for the agency with the most
advanced space technology in existence, or are simply there to get a
paycheck.
Any nuclear attack that has taken place is a total and complete tragedy.
If those who perpetuated the attack desired to do the right thing, they
should have organized a way to come forward to the public, and share
what they knew. Instead, these individuals -- many of which have
probably been actively participating in suppression of various topics --
may have taken another path that limits their personal risk while ending
the lives of others. Standing up and releasing highly classified
information about extraterrestrial life, exotic technologies that could
benefit all of humanity, or the operations of ultra secretive
organizations, can be risky. In fact, it can be very dangerous, but fear
of persecution is not an excuse for a nuclear attack.
I would urge the individuals and organizations that want to do the
"right thing" to avoid conflicts with other entities, and simply speak
up. Despite their rank, position, or situation they should organize the
information they have, and share it with the world. We live in an age
where communication is easier than ever before. If someone really wants
to tell a story, in a matter of hours or less they can upload videos of
their testimony to YouTube, send the video to thousands of people via
email, post the information on countless message boards, drop a few
hundred DVDs in the mailbox, create a Facebook profile with the
information, and transmit the information in so many ways NO ONE will be
able to stop it.
The more aspiring "good guys" who are willing to come forward and
distribute their story at the same time the better it is for everyone
involved.
There is no excuse for violence. Even when it comes protecting ones
self, the best defense is honesty and full disclosure. I think the
motivations and sincerity of any group that would perpetuate an act of
violence should be questioned.
Let's hope if a nuclear attack did happen on one or more top secret
bases, that these will be last such attacks.
What the world needs is the truth, the full truth, and nothing but the
truth.
Sterling Adds...
The fact that the President and Congress have such low approval ratings
has a lot to do with how unbelievable they have become. Who can trust
the government when they say: "This is how and why 9/11 happened, and
this is what we should do about it;" when a common sense look at what
actually happened screams so loudly to the contrary." Some truth from
the government would be nice, but it will take some time before people
start believing again because they have been lied to for so long.
# # #
This story is also published at
BeforeItsNews.
Links
www.pureenergysystems.com
PES Network, Inc.
Copyright © 2003 - 2011
|